首页> 外文OA文献 >How Many Mechanisms Are Needed to Analyze Speech? A Connectionist Simulation of Structural Rule Learning in Artificial Language Acquisition
【2h】

How Many Mechanisms Are Needed to Analyze Speech? A Connectionist Simulation of Structural Rule Learning in Artificial Language Acquisition

机译:分析言论需要多少机制?人工语言习得中结构规则学习的联结模拟

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Some empirical evidence in the artificial language acquisition literature has been taken to suggest that statistical learning mechanisms are insufficient for extracting structural information from an artificial language. According to the more than one mechanism (MOM) hypothesis, at least two mechanisms are required in order to acquire language from speech: (a) a statistical mechanism for speech segmentation; and (b) an additional rule‐following mechanism in order to induce grammatical regularities. In this article, we present a set of neural network studies demonstrating that a single statistical mechanism can mimic the apparent discovery of structural regularities, beyond the segmentation of speech. We argue that our results undermine one argument for the MOM hypothesis.
机译:人工语言习得文献中的一些经验证据表明,统计学习机制不足以从人工语言中提取结构信息。根据不止一种机制(MOM)的假设,至少需要两种机制才能从语音中获取语言:(a)语音分割的统计机制; (b)附加的规则遵循机制,以诱导语法规律性。在本文中,我们提出了一组神经网络研究,这些研究表明,单一的统计机制可以模仿语音细分以外的结构规律性的明显发现。我们认为我们的结果破坏了关于MOM假设的一种说法。

著录项

  • 作者

    Laakso, Aarre; Calvo, Paco;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号